Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz, while Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz is around 12% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1649 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
×Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | NA2 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q2 2009 | |
# of Samples | 9 | 1640 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 16.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1352(0.0%) | 1142(-15.5%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2348(0.0%) | 2068(-12.0%) |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | 2,348 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz | 2,068 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | NA | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz | 16.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | 1,352 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz | 1,142 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9750 @ 3.16GHz | Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |