Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Athlon II Neo K125 is newer than Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz, while Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz is around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, AMD Athlon II Neo K125 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 91 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Athlon II Neo K125 | |
2: Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz | |
×AMD Athlon II Neo K125 | ×Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | S1 | PGA478 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 1) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 64KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 12W | 31W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $2.19 | $5.66 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2010 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 37 | 54 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 4.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 6163(-2.5%) | 6323(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 315(-6.8%) | 339(0.0%) |
AMD Athlon II Neo K125 | 315 | |
Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz | 339 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon II Neo K125 | NA | |
Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz | 4.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon II Neo K125 | 616 | |
Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz | 632 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon II Neo K125 | Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 12W | 31W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.02 | 0.06 |
Running cost per day | $0.006 | $0.015 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 8.8 | 22.6 |
Running cost per year | $2.19 | $5.66 |