Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Opteron 3280 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz is around 41% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 23% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz uses around 38% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 265 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | |
2: AMD Opteron 3280 | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD Opteron 3280 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA2011 | AM3+ | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 2.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 8 (in 8 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 15MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 95W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2012 | Q3 2012 | |
# of Samples | 252 | 13 | |
CPU Value | 86.0 | 51.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1344(0.0%) | 1036(-22.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 6280(0.0%) | 3723(-40.7%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | 6,280 | |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 3,723 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | 86.0 | |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 51.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | 1,344 | |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 1,036 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | AMD Opteron 3280 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 95W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.19 | 0.13 |
Running cost per day | $0.048 | $0.033 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 69.3 | 47.5 |
Running cost per year | $17.34 | $11.86 |