Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz is around 39% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 307 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$19.95 - BUY
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011 | LGA2011-v3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 3.5 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | |
| TDP | 95W | 160W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $29.20 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2012 | Q4 2014 | |
| # of Samples | 208 | 99 | |
| CPU Value | 404.4 | 26.4 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1379(-27.9%) | 1912(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 8067(-44.5%) | 14540(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | 8,067 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz | 14,540 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | 404.4 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz | 26.4 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | 1,379 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz | 1,912 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 @ 2.20GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.10GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 95W | 160W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |