Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Opteron 3280 is newer than Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz uses around 21% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 66 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz | |
2: AMD Opteron 3280 | |
×Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz | ×AMD Opteron 3280 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA1366 | AM3+ | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.9 GHz | Up to 2.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 8 (in 8 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 12MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 80W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $14.60 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2010 | Q3 2012 | |
# of Samples | 53 | 13 | |
CPU Value | 55.5 | 51.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1189(0.0%) | 1036(-12.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3837(0.0%) | 3723(-3.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz | 3,837 | |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 3,723 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz | 55.5 | |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 51.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz | 1,189 | |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 1,036 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5640 @ 2.67GHz | AMD Opteron 3280 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 80W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.16 | 0.13 |
Running cost per day | $0.040 | $0.033 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 58.4 | 47.5 |
Running cost per year | $14.60 | $11.86 |