Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2609 @ 2.40GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz uses around 48% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1805 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2609 @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$69 - BUY
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011 | LGA2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | |
| TDP | 80W | 130W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $14.60 | $23.73 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2012 | Q2 2012 | |
| # of Samples | 78 | 1727 | |
| CPU Value | 42.6 | 83.5 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1131(-35.5%) | 1753(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2943(-49.7%) | 5846(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 @ 2.40GHz | 2,943 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 5,846 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 @ 2.40GHz | 42.6 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 83.5 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 @ 2.40GHz | 1,131 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 1,753 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 @ 2.40GHz | Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 80W | 130W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |