Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz also around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz uses around 45% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 4059 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $48.02 - BUY | |
Socket Type | LGA771 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 150W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 4055 | |
CPU Value | 1.5 | 48.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1451(0.0%) | 1216(-16.2%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2780(0.0%) | 2339(-15.9%) |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz | 2,780 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 2,339 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz | 1.5 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 48.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz | 1,451 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 1,216 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz | Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |