Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz is newer than AMD Athlon LE-1620, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Athlon LE-1620 uses around 25% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 158 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Athlon LE-1620 | |
2: Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz | |
×AMD Athlon LE-1620 | ×Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | AM2 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 1) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 64KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 45W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $8.21 | $6.39 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 34 | 124 | |
CPU Value | 23.4 | 1.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4753(-37.7%) | 7633(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 421(-2.8%) | 433(0.0%) |
AMD Athlon LE-1620 | 421 | |
Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz | 433 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon LE-1620 | 23.4 | |
Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz | 1.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon LE-1620 | 475 | |
Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz | 763 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon LE-1620 | Intel Celeron 450 @ 2.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 45W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.09 | 0.07 |
Running cost per day | $0.022 | $0.018 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 32.9 | 25.6 |
Running cost per year | $8.21 | $6.39 |