Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 7F32 is around 27% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 7F32 uses around 32% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 285 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F32 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$199.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 130W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $23.73 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2013 | Q4 2020 | |
# of Samples | 277 | 8 | |
CPU Value | 66.0 | 116.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1870(-21.1%) | 2370(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 13417(-42.2%) | 23198(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | 13,417 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,198 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | 66.0 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 116.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | 1,870 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,370 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 130W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |