Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz also around 45% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 24% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7F32 uses around 44% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 362 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F32 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $129.95 - BUY | $199.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 115W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $20.99 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2013 | Q4 2020 | |
# of Samples | 355 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 97.5 | 115.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1790(-23.7%) | 2347(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 12674(-45.2%) | 23142(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz | 12,674 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,142 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz | 97.5 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 115.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz | 1,790 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,347 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz | AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 115W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.23 | 0.36 |
Running cost per day | $0.058 | $0.090 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 84.0 | 131.4 |
Running cost per year | $20.99 | $32.85 |