Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz is newer than AMD Opteron 4386 and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz uses around 38% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1163 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Opteron 4386 | |
2: Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz | |
×AMD Opteron 4386 | ×Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$232.12 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | C32 | LGA2011-v3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (in 4 physical modules) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 6MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | |
TDP | 95W | 140W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $25.55 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2014 | Q3 2014 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 1160 | |
CPU Value | 7.1 | 30.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 777(-61.3%) | 2007(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3273(-53.2%) | 6986(0.0%) |
AMD Opteron 4386 | 3,273 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 6,986 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 4386 | 7.1 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 30.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 4386 | 777 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 2,007 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 4386 | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 95W | 140W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.19 | 0.28 |
Running cost per day | $0.048 | $0.070 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 69.3 | 102.2 |
Running cost per year | $17.34 | $25.55 |