Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD PRO A12-9800 is newer than Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz also around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 119 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz | |
2: AMD PRO A12-9800 | |
×Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz | ×AMD PRO A12-9800 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA1150 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 4) | 4 (in 4 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 3MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 4.0MB, | |
TDP | 35W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $11.86 | |
Other | R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2015 | Q1 2017 | |
# of Samples | 86 | 33 | |
CPU Value | 15.7 | 22.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1804(0.0%) | 1705(-5.5%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3141(-16.4%) | 3755(0.0%) |
Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz | 3,141 | |
AMD PRO A12-9800 | 3,755 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz | 15.7 | |
AMD PRO A12-9800 | 22.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz | 1,804 | |
AMD PRO A12-9800 | 1,705 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i3-4170T @ 3.20GHz | AMD PRO A12-9800 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.07 | 0.13 |
Running cost per day | $0.018 | $0.033 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 25.6 | 47.5 |
Running cost per year | $6.39 | $11.86 |