Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Opteron 3280 is newer than Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz also around 21% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz is around 18% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Opteron 3280 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 536 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Opteron 3280 | |
2: Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz | |
×AMD Opteron 3280 | ×Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | AM3+ | LGA1366 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.7 GHz | Up to 2.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (in 8 physical modules) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 8MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 65W | 130W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $23.73 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2012 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 13 | 523 | |
CPU Value | 51.7 | 49.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1036(-18.1%) | 1266(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3723(0.0%) | 2930(-21.3%) |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 3,723 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz | 2,930 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 51.7 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz | 49.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 3280 | 1,036 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz | 1,266 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 3280 | Intel Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 130W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.13 | 0.26 |
Running cost per day | $0.033 | $0.065 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 47.5 | 94.9 |
Running cost per year | $11.86 | $23.73 |