Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz is newer than Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz also around 11% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 19% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2183 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz | ×Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $125 - BUY | $207.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 4.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 140W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $25.55 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 513 | 1670 | |
CPU Value | 115.7 | 78.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2327(-19.1%) | 2875(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 14462(-11.5%) | 16332(0.0%) |
Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz | 14,462 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 16,332 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz | 115.7 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 78.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz | 2,327 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 2,875 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz | Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 140W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |