Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD PRO A6-9500 is newer than Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz, while Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz is around 24% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 15% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD PRO A6-9500 uses around 24% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 57 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz | |
2: AMD PRO A6-9500 | |
×Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz | ×AMD PRO A6-9500 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1151 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
TDP | 51W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $9.31 | $11.86 | |
Other | R5, 8 COMPUTE CORES 2C+6G | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q1 2017 | |
# of Samples | 29 | 28 | |
CPU Value | 2.2 | 24.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1781(0.0%) | 1520(-14.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2358(0.0%) | 1784(-24.3%) |
Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz | 2,358 | |
AMD PRO A6-9500 | 1,784 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz | 2.2 | |
AMD PRO A6-9500 | 24.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz | 1,781 | |
AMD PRO A6-9500 | 1,520 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3920 @ 2.90GHz | AMD PRO A6-9500 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 51W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.10 | 0.13 |
Running cost per day | $0.025 | $0.033 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 37.2 | 47.5 |
Running cost per year | $9.31 | $11.86 |