Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is newer than Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 10% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Ryzen 5 1600 uses around 24% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7902 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $115 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1151 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 576KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 51W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $9.31 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel HD Graphics 610 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2017 | Q1 2017 | |
# of Samples | 10 | 7892 | |
CPU Value | 16.2 | 106.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1851(-10.4%) | 2066(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2322(-81.1%) | 12276(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 2,322 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | 12,276 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 16.2 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | 106.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 1,851 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | 2,066 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 51W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |