Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is newer than Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3100 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$125 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1151 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 576KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 51W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $9.31 | $17.34 | |
Other | Intel HD Graphics 610 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | |
# of Samples | 10 | 3090 | |
CPU Value | 16.2 | 104.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1851(-15.6%) | 2195(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2322(-82.2%) | 13039(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 2,322 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | 13,039 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 16.2 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | 104.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 1,851 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | 2,195 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 51W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |