Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9124 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6152 @ 2.10GHz also around 42% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9124 uses around 35% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 29 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6152 @ 2.10GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 9124 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6152 @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9124 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $650 - BUY | $1218.99 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 22 (Threads: 44) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 16MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 140W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $25.55 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 22 | |
CPU Value | 39.3 | 36.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2041(-25.7%) | 2747(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 25521(-42.2%) | 44137(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6152 @ 2.10GHz | 25,521 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 44,137 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6152 @ 2.10GHz | 39.3 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 36.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6152 @ 2.10GHz | 2,041 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 2,747 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6152 @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 9124 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 140W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.28 | 0.40 |
Running cost per day | $0.070 | $0.100 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 102.2 | 146.0 |
Running cost per year | $25.55 | $36.50 |