Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz also around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 48 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | |
2: Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | |
×Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | ×Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1310 | LGA1155 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 12) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 896KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 25W | 45W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $4.56 | $8.21 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2018 | Q3 2011 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 46 | |
CPU Value | 14.2 | 15.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 652(-55.4%) | 1460(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4707(0.0%) | 4069(-13.5%) |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | 4,707 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | 4,069 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | 14.2 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | 15.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | 652 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | 1,460 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 25W | 45W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.05 | 0.09 |
Running cost per day | $0.013 | $0.022 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 18.3 | 32.9 |
Running cost per year | $4.56 | $8.21 |