Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron G3900TE @ 2.30GHz is newer than Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz also around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 874 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
×Intel Celeron G3900TE @ 2.30GHz | ×Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $41.95 - BUY | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1151 | FCBGA1090 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 2.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 112KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 35W | 6W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $1.10 | |
Other | Intel HD Graphics 510 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | |
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2018 | Q2 2018 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 870 | |
CPU Value | 44.1 | 13.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1402(0.0%) | 1038(-26.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1850(0.0%) | 1427(-22.9%) |
Intel Celeron G3900TE @ 2.30GHz | 1,850 | |
Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 1,427 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Celeron G3900TE @ 2.30GHz | 44.1 | |
Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 13.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Celeron G3900TE @ 2.30GHz | 1,402 | |
Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 1,038 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Celeron G3900TE @ 2.30GHz | Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 6W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |