Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7573X is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 6 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7573X | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7573X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 36MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 165W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $51.10 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2019 | Q3 2022 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 18.5 | 13.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2239(-16.3%) | 2674(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 30347(-56.3%) | 69432(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 30,347 | |
AMD EPYC 7573X | 69,432 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 18.5 | |
AMD EPYC 7573X | 13.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 2,239 | |
AMD EPYC 7573X | 2,674 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | AMD EPYC 7573X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.33 | 0.56 |
Running cost per day | $0.083 | $0.140 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 120.5 | 204.4 |
Running cost per year | $30.11 | $51.10 |