Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7402P is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6252 @ 2.10GHz also around 39% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 7% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7402P uses around 18% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 37 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 7402P | ×Intel Xeon Gold 6252 @ 2.10GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $889.95 - BUY | $1006.4 - BUY | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 32MB | |
TDP | 180W | 150W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $32.85 | $27.38 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2019 | Q3 2019 | |
# of Samples | 35 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 49.6 | 27.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2035(0.0%) | 1883(-7.5%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 44176(0.0%) | 27148(-38.5%) |
AMD EPYC 7402P | 44,176 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6252 @ 2.10GHz | 27,148 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7402P | 49.6 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6252 @ 2.10GHz | 27.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7402P | 2,035 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6252 @ 2.10GHz | 1,883 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7402P | Intel Xeon Gold 6252 @ 2.10GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 180W | 150W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |