Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9275F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 39% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 5 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 9275F | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9275F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$769.95 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 19MB | L1: 1,920KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 125W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2020 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 26.5 | 23.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2064(-39.1%) | 3387(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 20429(-74.4%) | 79778(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz | 20,429 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 79,778 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz | 26.5 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 23.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz | 2,064 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 3,387 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6226 @ 2.70GHz | AMD EPYC 9275F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.25 | 0.64 |
Running cost per day | $0.063 | $0.160 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 91.3 | 233.6 |
Running cost per year | $22.81 | $58.40 |