Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz is newer than Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz and is around 34% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz is around 23% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 643 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | ×Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$269.99 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.6 GHz | Up to 5.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | |
TDP | 35W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 39 | 604 | |
CPU Value | 42.1 | 73.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2475(-18.4%) | 3033(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 14743(-25.5%) | 19798(0.0%) |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 14,743 | |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 19,798 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 42.1 | |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 73.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 2,475 | |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 3,033 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |