Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz is newer than Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz also around 26% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 19% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 558 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
×Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | ×Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $424.09 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.6 GHz | Up to 5.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | |
TDP | 35W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 36 | 522 | |
CPU Value | 42.4 | 46.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2469(-18.5%) | 3030(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 14822(-25.5%) | 19906(0.0%) |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 14,822 | |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 19,906 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 42.4 | |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 46.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | 2,469 | |
Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 3,030 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Intel Core i9-10900T @ 1.90GHz | Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 35W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |