Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F52 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz and is around 27% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 7F52 is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 7F52 uses around 18% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 27 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 7F52 | ×Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$1098.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 18 (Threads: 36) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 25MB | |
TDP | 240W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $43.80 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q2 2019 | |
# of Samples | 15 | 12 | |
CPU Value | 21.8 | 29.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2507(0.0%) | 2359(-5.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 41322(0.0%) | 32494(-21.4%) |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | 32,494 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 21.8 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | 29.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | 2,359 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | Intel Xeon Gold 6254 @ 3.10GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 240W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |