Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz is newer than Intel Core i3-10300 @ 3.70GHz and is around 5% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz is around -20% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 287 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core i3-10300 @ 3.70GHz | ×Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$206.7 - BUY
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 3.7 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 4.4 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 12MB | |
| TDP | 65W | 35W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $6.39 | |
| Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q3 2020 | |
| # of Samples | 74 | 213 | |
| CPU Value | 44.9 | 53.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2683(0.0%) | 2141(-20.2%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 9290(-5.1%) | 9789(0.0%) |
| Intel Core i3-10300 @ 3.70GHz | 9,290 | |
| Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | 9,789 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i3-10300 @ 3.70GHz | 44.9 | |
| Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | 53.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i3-10300 @ 3.70GHz | 2,683 | |
| Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | 2,141 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i3-10300 @ 3.70GHz | Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 65W | 35W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |