Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz is newer than Intel Core i5-10500 @ 3.10GHz and is around -25% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz is around -23% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2259 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | ×Intel Core i5-10500 @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
$159 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
| Cache | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 12MB | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 12MB | |
| TDP | 35W | 65W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $11.86 | |
| Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2020 | Q2 2020 | |
| # of Samples | 207 | 2052 | |
| CPU Value | 53.7 | 82.3 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2140(-23.5%) | 2796(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 9778(-25.3%) | 13090(0.0%) |
| Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | 9,778 | |
| Intel Core i5-10500 @ 3.10GHz | 13,090 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | 53.7 | |
| Intel Core i5-10500 @ 3.10GHz | 82.3 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | 2,140 | |
| Intel Core i5-10500 @ 3.10GHz | 2,796 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i5-10400T @ 2.00GHz | Intel Core i5-10500 @ 3.10GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 35W | 65W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |