Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LAGOON is newer than Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6150 also around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 436 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6150 | |
2: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LAGOON | |
×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6150 | ×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LAGOON | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | NA2 | NA2 | |
TDP | NA2 | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2021 | Q1 2021 | |
# of Samples | 299 | 137 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1283(-21.9%) | 1643(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2939(-14.4%) | 3435(0.0%) |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6150 | 2,939 | |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LAGOON | 3,435 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6150 | 1,283 | |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LAGOON | 1,643 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6150 | Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LAGOON | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |