Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Hisilicon Kirin 990, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Hisilicon Kirin 990 is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 631 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Hisilicon Kirin 990 | |
2: Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | |
×Hisilicon Kirin 990 | ×Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | FCBGA1338 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 2.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 10W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $1.83 | |
Other | Mali-G76 MP16 | Intel UHD Graphics | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2021 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 50 | 581 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 13.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1658(0.0%) | 1504(-9.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3965(-1.6%) | 4030(0.0%) |
Hisilicon Kirin 990 | 3,965 | |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 4,030 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Hisilicon Kirin 990 | NA | |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 13.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Hisilicon Kirin 990 | 1,658 | |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 1,504 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Hisilicon Kirin 990 | Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 10W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | 0.02 |
Running cost per day | NA | $0.005 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | 7.3 |
Running cost per year | NA | $1.82 |