Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7352 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz also around 39% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz is around 11% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7352 uses around 21% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 18 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7352 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7352 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$790.41 - BUY
![]() |
$749.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 28MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 125W | 155W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $28.29 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q3 2021 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 11 | |
CPU Value | 31.3 | 53.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2234(0.0%) | 1979(-11.4%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 24742(-38.7%) | 40370(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 24,742 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 40,370 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 31.3 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 53.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 2,234 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 1,979 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 7352 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 155W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.25 | 0.31 |
Running cost per day | $0.063 | $0.077 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 91.3 | 113.2 |
Running cost per year | $22.81 | $28.29 |