Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 is newer than Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 is around 12% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 189 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | ×Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | NA2 | NA2 | |
TDP | NA2 | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q1 2021 | |
# of Samples | 52 | 137 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1892(-12.3%) | 2158(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5359(-0.7%) | 5398(0.0%) |
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 5,359 | |
Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 5,398 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 1,892 | |
Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 2,158 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |