Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 75F3, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz is around 19% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 75F3 | |
2: Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz | |
×AMD EPYC 75F3 | ×Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA4189 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 48MB | |
TDP | 280W | 270W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $51.10 | $49.28 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q1 2023 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 15.2 | 15.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2129(-18.9%) | 2625(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 59973(0.0%) | 59038(-1.6%) |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 59,973 | |
Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz | 59,038 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 15.2 | |
Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz | 15.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 2,129 | |
Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz | 2,625 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Intel Xeon W-3365 @ 2.70GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 280W | 270W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.56 | 0.54 |
Running cost per day | $0.140 | $0.135 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 204.4 | 197.1 |
Running cost per year | $51.10 | $49.28 |