Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz is newer than AMD Athlon X4 860K, while AMD Athlon X4 860K is around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz is around 31% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Athlon X4 860K uses around 48% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1391 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz | |
2: AMD Athlon X4 860K | |
×Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz | ×AMD Athlon X4 860K | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $69.97 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FM2+ | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 4 (in 2 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 64KB, L2: 0.3MB, L3: 4MB | L1: 448KB, L2: 8.0MB, | |
TDP | 58W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $10.59 | $17.34 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q3 2014 | |
# of Samples | 19 | 1372 | |
CPU Value | 31.0 | 49.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2227(0.0%) | 1529(-31.4%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2787(-18.9%) | 3436(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz | 2,787 | |
AMD Athlon X4 860K | 3,436 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz | 31.0 | |
AMD Athlon X4 860K | 49.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz | 2,227 | |
AMD Athlon X4 860K | 1,529 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G5925 @ 3.60GHz | AMD Athlon X4 860K | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 58W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.12 | 0.19 |
Running cost per day | $0.029 | $0.048 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 42.3 | 69.3 |
Running cost per year | $10.59 | $17.34 |