Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Mars based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 is newer than Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA, while Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA is around 8% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 15% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1424 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Mars based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | |
2: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA | |
×Mars based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | ×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | NA2 | NA2 | |
TDP | NA2 | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q1 2021 | |
# of Samples | 6 | 1418 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1984(-15.1%) | 2337(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5230(-7.8%) | 5669(0.0%) |
Mars based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 5,230 | |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA | 5,669 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Mars based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 1,984 | |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA | 2,337 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Mars based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |