Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 72F3 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz, while Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz is around 47% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but AMD EPYC 72F3 is around 20% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz uses around 27% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 6 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 72F3 | |
2: Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz | |
×AMD EPYC 72F3 | ×Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$1178.27 - BUY
![]() |
$2111.99 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA4189 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.1 GHz | Up to 3.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 28 (Threads: 56) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 80KB, L2: 1.3MB, L3: 42MB | |
TDP | 180W | 235W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $32.85 | $42.89 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2021 | Q3 2021 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 23.1 | 24.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3070(0.0%) | 2465(-19.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 27252(-47.4%) | 51843(0.0%) |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | 27,252 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz | 51,843 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | 23.1 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz | 24.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | 3,070 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz | 2,465 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | Intel Xeon Gold 6348 @ 2.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 180W | 235W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.36 | 0.47 |
Running cost per day | $0.090 | $0.117 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 131.4 | 171.5 |
Running cost per year | $32.85 | $42.89 |