Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 74F3, while AMD EPYC 74F3 is around 45% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 31% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 74F3 uses around 37% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 22 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 74F3 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 74F3 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $1250 - BUY | $2989.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 384KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 32MB | |
TDP | 165W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2022 | Q4 2021 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 17 | |
CPU Value | 26.5 | 20.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2022(-31.3%) | 2942(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 33139(-45.4%) | 60666(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz | 33,139 | |
AMD EPYC 74F3 | 60,666 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz | 26.5 | |
AMD EPYC 74F3 | 20.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz | 2,022 | |
AMD EPYC 74F3 | 2,942 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 74F3 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.33 | 0.48 |
Running cost per day | $0.083 | $0.120 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 120.5 | 175.2 |
Running cost per year | $30.11 | $43.80 |