Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel N100 is newer than Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA-IOT and is around -21% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel N100 is around -25% slower in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 3436 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA-IOT | ×Intel N100 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | NA2 | FCBGA1264 | |
| CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
| Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 0.7 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 3.4 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
| Cache | NA2 | L1: 384KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 6MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 6W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $1.10 | |
| Other | Intel UHD Graphics | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2022 | Q1 2023 | |
| # of Samples | 5 | 3431 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 41.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2528(0.0%) | 1895(-25.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 6752(0.0%) | 5355(-20.7%) |
| Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA-IOT | 6,752 | |
| Intel N100 | 5,355 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA-IOT | NA | |
| Intel N100 | 41.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA-IOT | 2,528 | |
| Intel N100 | 1,895 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA-IOT | Intel N100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 6W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |