Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Samsung M13 EUR OPEN REV02 board based on EXYNOS85 is newer than Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8094, while Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8094 is around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 5 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8094 | |
2: Samsung M13 EUR OPEN REV02 board based on EXYNOS85 | |
×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8094 | ×Samsung M13 EUR OPEN REV02 board based on EXYNOS85 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | NA2 | NA2 | |
TDP | NA2 | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2022 | Q1 2023 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 552(0.0%) | 516(-6.4%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1564(0.0%) | 1425(-8.9%) |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8094 | 1,564 | |
Samsung M13 EUR OPEN REV02 board based on EXYNOS85 | 1,425 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8094 | 552 | |
Samsung M13 EUR OPEN REV02 board based on EXYNOS85 | 516 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8094 | Samsung M13 EUR OPEN REV02 board based on EXYNOS85 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |