Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 3251, while AMD EPYC 3251 is around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 22 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 3251 | |
×Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz | ×AMD EPYC 3251 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1787 | SP4r2 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.4 GHz | Up to 3.1 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 480KB, L2: 7.5MB, L3: 12MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 25W | 50W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $4.56 | $9.13 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2022 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 6 | 16 | |
CPU Value | 36.2 | 44.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2542(0.0%) | 1881(-26.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 12591(-9.5%) | 13912(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz | 12,591 | |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 13,912 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz | 36.2 | |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 44.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz | 2,542 | |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 1,881 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-11555MLE @ 1.90GHz | AMD EPYC 3251 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 25W | 50W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.05 | 0.10 |
Running cost per day | $0.013 | $0.025 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 18.3 | 36.5 |
Running cost per year | $4.56 | $9.13 |