Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon 5160 @ 3.00GHz is newer than AMD Opteron 275 also around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Opteron 275 uses around 17% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 99 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Opteron 275 | |
2: Intel Xeon 5160 @ 3.00GHz | |
×AMD Opteron 275 | ×Intel Xeon 5160 @ 3.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$149.95 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | 940 | LGA771 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 95W | 80W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $14.60 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 97 | |
CPU Value | 5.6 | 22.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 445(-60.8%) | 11343(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 839(-12.9%) | 963(0.0%) |
AMD Opteron 275 | 839 | |
Intel Xeon 5160 @ 3.00GHz | 963 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 275 | 5.6 | |
Intel Xeon 5160 @ 3.00GHz | 22.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 275 | 445 | |
Intel Xeon 5160 @ 3.00GHz | 1,134 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 275 | Intel Xeon 5160 @ 3.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 95W | 80W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.19 | 0.16 |
Running cost per day | $0.048 | $0.040 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 69.3 | 58.4 |
Running cost per year | $17.34 | $14.60 |