Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9224 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ also around 45% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ is around 30% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9224 uses around 29% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 13 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | |
2: AMD EPYC 9224 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | ×AMD EPYC 9224 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.1 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 23MB | L1: 3,072KB, L2: 48.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 150W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2023 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 9 | 4 | |
CPU Value | 23.4 | 23.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3223(0.0%) | 2266(-29.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 24956(-44.8%) | 45223(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | 24,956 | |
AMD EPYC 9224 | 45,223 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | 23.4 | |
AMD EPYC 9224 | 23.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | 3,223 | |
AMD EPYC 9224 | 2,266 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+ | AMD EPYC 9224 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.30 | 0.40 |
Running cost per day | $0.075 | $0.100 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 109.5 | 146.0 |
Running cost per year | $27.38 | $36.50 |