Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Opteron 1220 is newer than Intel Xeon 3060 @ 2.40GHz also around 5% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 11% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Opteron 1220 uses around 45% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 15 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD Opteron 1220 | |
2: Intel Xeon 3060 @ 2.40GHz | |
×AMD Opteron 1220 | ×Intel Xeon 3060 @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | AM2 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 103W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $18.80 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2009 | Q3 2009 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 10 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 42.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 10773(0.0%) | 957(-11.2%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1036(0.0%) | 983(-5.1%) |
AMD Opteron 1220 | 1,036 | |
Intel Xeon 3060 @ 2.40GHz | 983 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 1220 | NA | |
Intel Xeon 3060 @ 2.40GHz | 42.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 1220 | 1,077 | |
Intel Xeon 3060 @ 2.40GHz | 957 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 1220 | Intel Xeon 3060 @ 2.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 103W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.21 | 0.13 |
Running cost per day | $0.051 | $0.033 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 75.2 | 47.5 |
Running cost per year | $18.80 | $11.86 |