Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz is newer than Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz is around 42% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 133 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | |
2: Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | |
×Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1310 | LGA1366 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 12MB | |
TDP | 26W | 130W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $4.75 | $23.73 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q2 2011 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 130 | |
CPU Value | 22.8 | 28.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 955(-41.6%) | 1636(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5100(-3.9%) | 5309(0.0%) |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | 5,100 | |
Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | 5,309 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | 22.8 | |
Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | 28.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | 955 | |
Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | 1,636 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3758R @ 2.40GHz | Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 26W | 130W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.05 | 0.26 |
Running cost per day | $0.013 | $0.065 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 19.0 | 94.9 |
Running cost per year | $4.75 | $23.73 |