Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Samsung s5e9945 is newer than Intel U300E also around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel U300E is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 138 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel U300E | |
2: Samsung s5e9945 | |
×Intel U300E | ×Samsung s5e9945 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1744 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 1.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.3 GHz | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 5 (Threads: 6) | 10 (Threads: 10) | |
Cache | L1: 464KB, L2: 3.3MB, L3: 8MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 15W | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | NA | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel Processors | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q1 2024 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 134 | |
CPU Value | 44.9 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3444(0.0%) | 2897(-15.9%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 8804(-19.4%) | 10930(0.0%) |
Intel U300E | 8,804 | |
Samsung s5e9945 | 10,930 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel U300E | 44.9 | |
Samsung s5e9945 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel U300E | 3,444 | |
Samsung s5e9945 | 2,897 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel U300E | Samsung s5e9945 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 15W | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.03 | NA |
Running cost per day | $0.007 | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 10.9 | NA |
Running cost per year | $2.74 | NA |