Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9275F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y also around 43% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 5% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9275F uses around 49% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 16 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y | |
2: AMD EPYC 9275F | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y | ×AMD EPYC 9275F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 38MB | L1: 1,920KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 195W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $35.59 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2024 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 14 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 30.2 | 23.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3216(-5.0%) | 3387(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 45769(-42.6%) | 79778(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y | 45,769 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 79,778 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y | 30.2 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 23.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y | 3,216 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 3,387 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y | AMD EPYC 9275F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 195W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.39 | 0.64 |
Running cost per day | $0.098 | $0.160 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 142.3 | 233.6 |
Running cost per year | $35.59 | $58.40 |