Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Athlon II X2 240e is newer than Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz, while Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz is around 22% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 17% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz uses around 36% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2606 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz | |
2: AMD Athlon II X2 240e | |
×Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz | ×AMD Athlon II X2 240e | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA775 | AM3 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
TDP | 65W | 45W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $8.21 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q4 2009 | |
# of Samples | 2492 | 114 | |
CPU Value | 11.7 | 26.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 13233(0.0%) | 10973(-17.1%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1289(0.0%) | 1007(-21.8%) |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz | 1,289 | |
AMD Athlon II X2 240e | 1,007 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz | 11.7 | |
AMD Athlon II X2 240e | 26.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz | 1,323 | |
AMD Athlon II X2 240e | 1,097 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz | AMD Athlon II X2 240e | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 45W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.13 | 0.09 |
Running cost per day | $0.033 | $0.022 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 47.5 | 32.9 |
Running cost per year | $11.86 | $8.21 |