Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while AMD EPYC 9135 is around 49% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 39% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9135 uses around 29% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 5 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 9135 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9135 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,152KB, L2: 18.0MB, L3: 25MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 150W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 23.0 | 47.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2225(-39.5%) | 3675(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 29301(-48.9%) | 57380(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | 29,301 | |
AMD EPYC 9135 | 57,380 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | 23.0 | |
AMD EPYC 9135 | 47.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | 2,225 | |
AMD EPYC 9135 | 3,675 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 9135 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.30 | 0.40 |
Running cost per day | $0.075 | $0.100 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 109.5 | 146.0 |
Running cost per year | $27.38 | $36.50 |