Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Samsung s5e9945 is around 11% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 106 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Core i7-13800HRE | |
2: Samsung s5e9945 | |
×Intel Core i7-13800HRE | ×Samsung s5e9945 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1744 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.0 GHz | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 14 (Threads: 20) | 10 (Threads: 10) | |
Cache | L1: 1,248KB, L2: 11.5MB, L3: 24MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 45W | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | $8.21 | NA | |
Other | Intel Iris Xe Graphics eligible | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q1 2024 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 105 | |
CPU Value | 19.7 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1437(-50.6%) | 2911(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 9781(-11.2%) | 11014(0.0%) |
Intel Core i7-13800HRE | 9,781 | |
Samsung s5e9945 | 11,014 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-13800HRE | 19.7 | |
Samsung s5e9945 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-13800HRE | 1,437 | |
Samsung s5e9945 | 2,911 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-13800HRE | Samsung s5e9945 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 45W | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.09 | NA |
Running cost per day | $0.022 | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 32.9 | NA |
Running cost per year | $8.21 | NA |