Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while AMD EPYC 9655P is around 48% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 37% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9655P uses around 13% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 13 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | |
2: AMD EPYC 9655P | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | ×AMD EPYC 9655P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 64 (Threads: 128) | 96 (Threads: 192) | |
Cache | L1: 5,120KB, L2: 128.0MB, L3: 320MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 350W | 400W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $63.87 | $73.00 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 12 | |
CPU Value | 7.2 | 14.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2411(-37.3%) | 3848(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 84013(-47.6%) | 160417(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 84,013 | |
AMD EPYC 9655P | 160,417 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 7.2 | |
AMD EPYC 9655P | 14.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 2,411 | |
AMD EPYC 9655P | 3,848 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ | AMD EPYC 9655P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 350W | 400W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.70 | 0.80 |
Running cost per day | $0.175 | $0.200 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 255.5 | 292.0 |
Running cost per year | $63.87 | $73.00 |