Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 34% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H uses around 25% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 12 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | ×Intel Xeon W-1290TE @ 1.80GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCBGA2049 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.4 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 16) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
Cache | L1: 1,632KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 24MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | |
TDP | 45W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $8.21 | $6.39 | |
Other | Intel Arc 140T GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 8 | 4 | |
CPU Value | 57.4 | 25.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4257(0.0%) | 2816(-33.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 37343(0.0%) | 14182(-62.0%) |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 37,343 | |
Intel Xeon W-1290TE @ 1.80GHz | 14,182 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 57.4 | |
Intel Xeon W-1290TE @ 1.80GHz | 25.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 4,257 | |
Intel Xeon W-1290TE @ 1.80GHz | 2,816 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Xeon W-1290TE @ 1.80GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 45W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |